It means that we have to go on good faith with a company that for four years did not respect the law, and that we have no signatures. It was said here today that there are no signatures. It was said that there is a possibility of 1,300 jobs. For me, I have an issue with the possibility of 1,300 jobs when the law says we should have 2,600 jobs here and that law is not being respected.
I would like that, if it's going to exist, to be in the bill that you're presenting. Why, if it's going to create jobs.... It doesn't say in there that it's going to create jobs. Why doesn't it say in the bill that there are going to be 1,300 jobs? If there is one thing that is clear right now with the current law—and it was interpreted by two courts—it is that those jobs should be here. The only thing this will do is not clarify the act. It's going to make it clear that the work can stay outside of Canada and that we can send more out. That's the only clarification that this is going to bring.