You're much more familiar with the amendments than I am. If you can't answer me, it means that there aren't any amendments to resolve this issue.
In addition, there has been a great deal of talk about safety. In another parallel study we're conducting on economic corridors, many witnesses have informed us of the alarming situation—this isn't an exaggeration—involving icebreakers. However, there doesn't seem to be any particular focus on speeding up the work to make navigation in our waterways safer. I'm referring specifically to the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes corridor. The renewal of the icebreaker fleet has been anticipated for a number of years.
Once again, have I missed anything? Is this issue not part of the bill? The budget bill contains dozens and dozens of legislative amendments, but it doesn't include the amendments that business owners and ship owners are eagerly awaiting? Have I made a mistake or missed something?