I will answer the question in French.
Perhaps this is due to an interpretation problem, but I did not say that this would necessarily stimulate tourism. I said that for the tourism industry and everything else, the presence of a carrier of the size of Air Canada is crucial in Canada. In addition the fact of having competitive conditions will allow this carrier to continue to offer flights to those who visit Canada as well as to those who go abroad. For a carrier to be able to offer a vast range of destinations, it must be able to have maximum flexibility in all of its operations, including its maintenance costs.
A company that is weakened by a lack of flexibility or by conditions that do not allow it to be competitive will eventually offer fewer destinations. It will have to reduce their number. The fact that its portfolio is reduced will have an impact on tourism. We are after all talking about an airline.
In conclusion I would say that competitive capacity is at the core of this bill. It is what ensures the durability of a company like Air Canada. Generally speaking, that is also true of the aerospace industry.