I was also responsible to Mr. Emerson for potash and a number of other commodities. Other commodities force your products.... Potash, the rest of them...they're dealing in a market-based system. In a way, they feel they're subsidizing the grain shipping. From that perspective, there is a distortion from that.
The other distortion that happens today is with new modes of transport. We mentioned containerized grain. We recommended that be excluded from the MRE as it really wasn't intended to be captured there. There was no containerized movement of grain when the MRE concept came in. It costs railways more to move containers, so therefore they are being penalized under an MRE system, and really they are not incented to make that capacity available.
I believe that's a major part of our future capacity creation, so when we have crops that are unexpectedly large, containerized movements can happen.
The other thing we have in the MRE that distorts is what we call the free rider rights. If one railway makes an investment and the other railway makes less of an investment, they actually equalize the investment. So, if CN makes a bigger investment than CP, CP gets half of CN's investment. The free rider rights really are not very fair, and they don't incent investment.
These are all the things that I think are problematic. Rates are one thing, but the MRE does create a number of other problems.