Yes, sure, I will.
On interswitching, I think a very important consideration is that during the deliberations, we had a very limited ability to poll examples of actual utilization of the interswitching provisions that were extended out to 160 kilometres. That said, when we do look at it in a kind of post-report reflection, we see that shippers don't agree that the infrequent use of that provision makes the feature of their regulatory regime have limited effectiveness or impact. The measure of success of interswitching, in the eyes of many shippers, is how it actually creates that competitive force.
One of the things that we have to be very clear on is that industry took that recommendation to mean that we thought interswitching was not important. What we recommended was sunsetting the 160 kilometres and putting it back into the hands of the agency to allow them to determine the appropriate distances in the appropriate cases. I think this is what Mr. Emerson is referring to: the need for a cohesive mandate and strategy around utilization of interswitching as a competitive measure provision. I think that's important. We do recognize the importance of it; it was much more the methodology, the arbitrary nature of the 160 kilometres that we were really commenting on.