Thank you very much, and thank you for a great deal of information in your comments and answers to questions.
I want to drill down a little bit because, as you know, over the past number of sessions a number of witnesses have come forward, and their recommendations cover a broad spectrum.
I want to go back to the rail line. It struck me as very interesting, because I heard you say that the interswitching zone should be expanded. The rail lines have said that putting the 160-kilometre capacity in was totally unnecessary, that it should be removed permanently, that it should only be 30 kilometres, and that basically we didn't know what we were doing when we put that in. That's one piece.
The second piece, when I asked about competition, was with BNSF. They were saying that our requirements are not parallel to the U.S. requirements, so if we did away with the legislation, that basically would take BNSF out of the game.
I have one more thing to say, then I'd like your comments on it.
The last piece is that 785 additional railcars are basically simply sitting there, by leaving the 160-kilometre interswitching limit in place.
Can you guys comment on any of that?