The mandate letter does indicate that lost protections should be restored, but that doesn't mean a word-for-word recreation of the previous legislation. Perhaps the elements of the act that were amended by the previous government did not really have to do with protections, but they make sense. This is about more than just restoring the legislation to its previous incarnation. I clearly said in my presentation that some things seem reasonable. Ultimately, you will be the ones looking into this issue.
As for modern safeguards, that is a general suggestion. When you hear the testimony of various groups, they may bring forward some aspects that have not been mentioned in the past and are not part of the legislation, but that seem relevant to you in terms of protection. It is up to you to use your report to advise us on this issue.