As I understand it, some of the concern is with the automatic trigger for an assessment based on a navigable water. Part of the whole reform with respect to CEAA was to look at some of those triggers and to make sure that we didn't have a duplication. If the provincial government, for example, has already done an environmental assessment, why does it have to be assessed again federally just because somebody has floated an idea and thinks a drainage ditch is navigable? It just didn't make a lot of sense.
With respect to what the impacts have been on commercial navigation, we certainly aren't aware of any problems or concerns with structures being constructed on navigable waters that have changed or made them different in any way from the previous legislation.