In the discussions that we've had so far, there has been a great appreciation for some of the reasons the legislation was changed, particularly to enable municipal works to go ahead without undue red tape and delay. You can correct me if I'm wrong, but what we look at when we talk in terms of modernizing the act and restoring protections is really all about the process for determining proactively whether there's potential harm. It would involve proper public notice that something's going to happen, and then an opportunity for people to speak up if they see a problem. What I see as essential elements to a new process would be to somehow maintain a streamlined, efficient, and timely process so that public works or the private landowners aren't unduly lengthened or made more expensive, and then a fair process, one that hears all sides and explains the situation or explains the decision when it comes down, so that everybody understands how their input was reflected in the deliberation. Is there anything else that you can think of, off the top?
To the Council of Canadians, do you have any first-blush reaction to that?