The question then comes back to the $49.3 million that you're asking to be allocated for contingencies. My understanding of P3s is that risks are transferred to the private partner, so what's the necessity for this rather large amount of money?
February 24th, 2016 / 3:55 p.m.
Liberal
Ken Hardie Liberal Fleetwood—Port Kells, BC
The question then comes back to the $49.3 million that you're asking to be allocated for contingencies. My understanding of P3s is that risks are transferred to the private partner, so what's the necessity for this rather large amount of money?
See context to find out what was said next.