When it comes to training—local training, paid training, apprenticeships, and local job opportunities for community members—absolutely. I think this bill emphasizes that, but when you get into looking at this through the lens of the greenhouse emissions that would be emitted by a particular project, I think the bill emphasizes the community identifying its own benefits. I think it would be difficult to fit that into what the community identifies. However, nothing would stop the community from, for example, demanding that the community benefit that they would identify would be a local park that would sort of balance out the environmental degradation that would emanate from a particular project.
