Maybe I can answer it this way. Depending on what project delivery method PSPC has decided is best suited to the procurement of the asset or infrastructure they are looking at, that would then give you the opportunity to see to what extent the community benefit aspect of that could also be a little more flexible. That decision is always made by PSPC at the outset, depending on what the infrastructure is. Are we going to design it completely and just go out for a price? Are we going to go out to the industry and ask them to design it and build it, and we'll just provide our design concept? Are we going to go to a P3? Are we going to use construction management? That will then dictate to what extent the community benefit element can be defined in the documents. I would suggest that it's the dog wagging the tail rather than the tail wagging the dog in that circumstance.
On November 1st, 2016. See this statement in context.