Perhaps I can start from the regulatory side.
I would say yes. There are very strong relationships, and have been for a number of years, as we've developed what we consider to be safety precautionary approaches and implemented them through the special flight operations certificates. That has been done in close consultation with the people using this technology. I've sat at a number of round tables and different discussions, conventions, etc. The industry is very aware that they have a lot of opportunity to do things, not just for economic purposes but to actually promote safety, and they are very concerned that it be handled responsibly. Of course, that doesn't cover every individual who may go awry, so that's why we need regulations.
I would add that it is not simply a division between risking safety for better economic opportunity. There are safety improvements with UAVs. A lot of low-level work that's currently being done by manned operations will be much safer if some of the more risky elements can be addressed by drones. A good example is in the provinces that have major forest firefighting endeavours. There is a lot of work over the next few years that they will be able to do better and with much less risk to humans, so there is a lot of safety benefit, not just a safety-economic trade-off.