As I said in my remarks, there is a vast majority of infrastructure that will have no need for the bank because there's no revenue attached to it.
We see the role of the bank in cases where there's a potential revenue or existing revenue that can be generated by the building of that infrastructure. Transmission infrastructure, for example, has revenue attached to it, so why would we not look at the bank to build that kind of infrastructure that is necessary? It also frees up the government resources that we can use to build more infrastructure where there's no revenue attached. That is one example.