Thank you.
This takes me to the second year of the program. There is no guarantee that we will recover in the second year what has not been saved in the first year simply because sums are being transferred.
No later than this morning, I spoke with some mayors of municipalities who said that when you miss a certain number of construction seasons, the actual effect is an increase in costs for the same infrastructure, because entrepreneurs have a great deal of choice.
Should the 0.4% target for the second year be increased, since there will be more money in the second year, or do I understand that this transfer of amounts to the second year will have no impact on GDP growth?