In your opening remarks, you mentioned that our second hour was going to be held in camera, and I was wondering why. We are not debating a specific report; there is nothing sensitive. In any case, two weeks ago we held our conversations in public and to my knowledge this did not create any major incidents. In addition, this morning since we have guests who are ENAP students it would be interesting for them if we allowed them to be present also for these debates among political parties. In that way, they could see that conciliation is possible.
And so I propose that the second hour be held in public, if possible.