I'm now left confused with what we're doing. On day one, my concern about rail safety was that we not try to deal with everything all in one bundle, so I'm left not understanding how the heck we're doing this review.
It makes sense to me if we have one day to talk about remote control devices, one day to talk about fatigue management, and maybe one on the broader review, because otherwise, we're going to have witnesses all over the place answering questions about all kinds of things, and it's not going to be a very orderly review.
I think we can come up with discrete witnesses who are useful for each of those separate ones, but I don't want them here all at once, because we won't even have a chance to ask them the appropriate questions.
If we can agree on how to divide up the pie, I think that would be helpful. Then we would know which witnesses we need first.