I would say that it's distinctly different from what Ontario put forward. Ontario has a plan focused on Infrastructure Ontario, an agency that deals with downstream procurement and the type of financing that leads to the construction and management of projects, which I think did demonstrate—I am not speaking for them—a lot of cost savings and efficiency.
I would officially disagree with my colleagues that this is necessarily a model that leads to an overall cost in the long run. If anything, overall average costs could be lower when you look at the amount of infrastructure that can be built, including—your example—in Ontario, which is very key. It really depends on the risk-adjusted return and what efficiencies are being accrued with respect to those projects, and those can be carefully managed and calibrated.