It would only be within the confines of the structure of the infrastructure bank. It would be limited to that partnership agreement, and the exposure would be limited to that particular construct. In theory, whatever the infrastructure bank's debt or equity position is, that would be the maximum exposure of that one party. If a private sector player took risk in a project and it didn't pan out, they would bear the risk. Their returns would be reduced. They may even lose all of their capital.
The Canada infrastructure bank's position can be lessened to no more than the amount that is in a project, but what happens is that the asset gets built and the public sector still has the use and enjoyment of that particular asset. That's the reality.