Let me move to follow up on my colleague Mr. Graham's line of questioning.
There was something I'm not sure I quite follow going on, but I was fascinated by it. It was something about running rights and the circumstances in which someone can't or won't ship your product.
Is what you were suggesting running railways almost as we do public highways? Subaru and Honda and Chrysler don't all have separate highways that only their cars can drive on.
Are you suggesting that the current infrastructure that is privately owned move to a public model that different operators could provide services on?