Maybe I'll start. The discussions we have had to date have somewhat focused on the idea of reasonableness, that the process will be reasonable. Fair enough, but there's a difference in the thinking on what the letter is and the legislation. There is a wider ambit of ministerial opportunity there, and we want to ensure that it is used in a reasonable way.
Who pays for it? My understanding is that in the U.S., those tests and analyses are paid for by the government after it pursues an initial discussion with the manufacturer.
Mark may have better insight on that provision. It's just an issue and a concern because of the unfettered power.