I have two things to say.
As for the first amendment, I quite appreciate the example that was given because it is precisely in line with what we want. What I heard was that it would be acceptable if it did not significantly reduce the safety standards. Therefore, a new technology could be accepted if it did not significantly reduce the safety standards, but it is already reducing them.
We believe that the basic standard is the one that currently exists. If the new technology being proposed satisfies that basic standard or exceeds our expectations, we would be fine with that. We aren't against apple pie, after all.
Regarding the second amendment, I think the “and” solves all the problems. It would make it mandatory to post the information on Transport Canada's website and on any other platform the minister deems appropriate.