I know you have used the term “persistent”, and the indigenous people who were here, specifically Eagle Spirit, will be one as well. Their argument is that you're putting this ban on them because it's persistent and there's a risk to the environment, yet other ports in Canada are going to be receiving persistent oils with the same inherent risks. How do we square that? Use whatever term you want to use. How can the ban apply to one, when those risks are not dealt with in the same way for the rest? How do you deal with that?
On November 21st, 2017. See this statement in context.