I think things have changed pretty significantly since the time of the merger. It's not really for me to comment on how Canadian North and First Air feel about it. I don't know what the conditions were, really, but I would expect that a lot of them would not be very appropriate in today's environment. If there were conditions relating to reduction in service, for example, when demand dries up, if you don't reduce service in some way, in some manner, you're just flying a lot of empty seats around. It makes no sense.
The communities themselves must have some minimum level of service. Many of their communities don't have road access, so there is a minimum level of service that needs to be maintained. I expect that they'll figure out what that is, based upon consultations with the community. We certainly did that in our market. The first thing we did when the pandemic hit was to reduce our service from 30 flights a week to five flights a week. The first people we heard from was the hospital and the Yukon government's emergency measures organization. They said that to keep the emergency supplies flowing, we needed to have more flights. We've worked out a schedule with them and added back some flights right away to make sure there is enough service to look after the essential supplies and transportation, even if it is less than the actual level of demand.
To answer your question more succinctly, I would suggest that a lot of the conditions may well be inappropriate in a pandemic environment.