Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all of our witnesses today for your presentations and for taking all the questions from the committee.
In Atlantic Canada, we have some major challenges, of course, and in rural Canada as well. The challenges seem to be compounded in terms of travel. We have major issues with the closure of routes to places such as Gander and Deer Lake in Labrador, in parts of Newfoundland and Labrador, and in other parts of Atlantic Canada.
That seems to be compounded by the Atlantic bubble, which has worked really well to protect the residents of the Atlantic provinces. We've been able to really control the spread of the virus and protect the lives of the people who live in Atlantic Canada. Many people believe that we've done a fantastic job of that.
Of course, the problem with it is that it's a catch-22 situation when it comes to travelling and airlines and airports. We have major issues with people such as rotational workers, for instance, who need to go to their jobs in other parts of Canada and fly back to Atlantic Canada. It's compounding their problems. Getting back and forth and getting home is creating all kinds of problems for these people. We have a situation where we're doing a great job of protecting health, but of course the airline industry has borne the brunt of that.
In our fall economic statement, we announced over a billion dollars in support for small and medium-sized airports. I know that there are ongoing negotiations with the airport and airline industry, and we're equally anxious to see something done that will salvage the airline industry.
I guess, depending on the demands.... Mr. Dias, you made reference to compensating Canadians. Do you think support for the air sector should be conditional on airlines restoring services to regional routes?
I'll put that question to Mr. Perry and then to Mr. Dias.