Are you referring to the fact that in the Navigable Waters Act, there were all kinds of environmental issues that we ensured, when you are talking about navigable waters, referred to rivers that you could actually navigate? I do remember that debate where the Navigable Waters Act was applied to many different types of bodies of water. I have examples. If you ever come to the wonderful riding of Regina—Qu'Appelle, I can show you spring runoff creeks that were subject to the Navigable Waters Act where there was no ability to ever navigate those bodies of water. We made sure they were adequately and forcefully protected in terms of environmental and watershed regulations. Surely we can agree that if you can't actually navigate a body of water, it might not belong under the Navigable Waters Act.
