What I'm suggesting is that there are, on the face of it from my perspective, some commitments.... Or maybe more specifically, when you look at appendix I of their corporate plan, where they lay out the models they intend to invest in, they are clearly suggesting that they're going to invest in what we call DBFM, or design-build-finance-maintain. This is generally referred to as the P3 model. They specifically have suggested that they would not be impacting or crowding out the investment that has traditionally gone into those models and those projects, but here is a clear suggestion that they are doing so
The other project, which I question myself, is the GO Expansion - On Corridor project. From my perspective, that project was proceeding under the Ontario government as a DBFM project, and only after the fact did CIB appear to come in and commit to providing funding to the project.
That was an example to me of a project that was proceeding as a DBFM P3 project here in Ontario under the Infrastructure Ontario model, with which I happen to be very familiar, given that I was previously at Infrastructure Ontario. It again is an example of the CIB perhaps not needing to commit to the project to meet the objectives it has laid out in its mandate.