Again, it's very early days with the bank. I think maybe they had a bit of conflict in finding their footing in this new space and what role they could play. That is natural. In a new institution, there are already a lot of players. I think we placed quite a bit of expectation on them, given the infrastructure deficit. In our view, their role is to attract capital and to help de-risk projects. That's where they need to be. There's no shortage of good projects to fund. I know that people get into the debate of shovel-worthy and shovel-ready. In our view, there are plenty of shovel-ready projects that need to be funded.
In terms of the criteria, again, I think this is what we should be looking at: What are the needs of the municipalities, of the provinces, and how can those be better aligned with the aspirations of the federal government? The Infrastructure Bank can play a role where they can de-risk or attract some of that capital.