I think there is a real risk in that for rural and remote communities or really any community anywhere that is interested in a type of project that investors are not interested in. What is that? Well, that's a small project in terms of capital costs, a project that is very risky, as we heard about. One of the selling points for the P3 community with the CIB is that it would take risk away. That's an absolute dream for an investor, to not actually have to bear any of the risk and to profit from it.
Rural and remote communities just might not have the kinds of infrastructure needs, other than probably broadband, which the CIB seems interested in targeting, or a few other things—retrofits, of course, or promoting a green infrastructure shift generally. But these things like LRTs are not quite so important for rural and remote communities. Maybe they need things like community centre upgrades or other kinds of community theatre projects, small water upgrades, things that probably the CIB and most likely private investors would not be eager to get their hands on, because they aren't able to be commercialized or they aren't necessarily profitable.