I appreciate the question. I think it's important for us that.... When we look at each of our projects, we think of the funding coming fundamentally from three sources. There's the traditional government-funded grant and subsidy world. Much infrastructure gets built that way, as well as many elements of social infrastructure. That's really important. That's always going to be the bedrock to how we get a lot of important infrastructure built. At the other end of the spectrum, there is truly commercial capital, but there's this important gap in the middle, and that's what the CIB is meant to fill.
To answer the member's question, yes, absolutely, we think of each of our projects as having money from each of those three streams. I talked about Alberta irrigation as an example, having $400 million from us, $250 million or just shy of that from the Alberta government, and then $163 million of non-governmental funding from irrigation districts.
I would say the same thing with regard to REM. There was $1.3 billion from us. There was a $1.8-billion contribution from the Government of Quebec, and there was $3.2 billion that came from the Caisse, from an institutional non-governmental investor.