Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Welcome to the witnesses.
My first question is for Mr. Field and has two or three parts.
I understand the need for a more coordinated approach, but we have also heard that there is no one-size-fits-all solution for a country as geographically vast and unique as Canada. Looking at all the projects and investments under way, I understand where the comment comes from.
The list is long. The Canada Infrastructure Bank will invest $3 billion. The universal broadband fund will provide $1.75 billion over 10 years. A total of $600 million will support low-earth orbit satellite capacity. The connect to innovate program will invest $585 million. The CRTC's broadband fund will invest $750 million. Broadband projects are eligible under the rural and northern communities infrastructure funding stream of the investing in Canada plan—$350 million to date—as well as under the first nation infrastructure fund—$50 million to date.
That's a lot of programs. What can you tell us about that?
I believe Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada coordinated its efforts with federal, provincial and municipal partners to make sure the funding is allocated appropriately, to avoid duplication.
Is it not better to have multiple programs and investments that target a wide range of solutions to make sure no Canadian is left behind?
With a range of programs, are there not more opportunities to apply for project funding?