Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Speaking directly to the amendment, I tend to agree with Mr. Scheer that it's a lovely amendment. It would make an even better stand-alone motion, perhaps with the timing coinciding with the arrival of the documents.
This motion is really about transparency and accountability for the public dollars that are going into these projects. The concerns around the structure of the infrastructure bank are now well known. They've been affirmed by the Parliamentary Budget Officer. We need more light on this issue, not less light. We need to understand exactly how these deals are structured and what the private investors are expecting to get out of it, and we need to do that on behalf of all Canadians.
I'll be voting against the amendment, and I certainly support the direction of the original motion.
Thank you.