Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all of the officials for answering our questions.
Mr. Brosseau, I want to pick up on a line of questioning that I started with Minister Alghabra. This is around the different levels, if you will, of notification that are provided to airlines, related to the risk of flying into or over conflict zones.
If I understood him correctly, there are a number of different notices that can go out. The most stringent level is the ban. However, at all of the levels prior to a ban, the ultimate risk assessment still lies with the airline, with the company. I'm wondering about the incentive that those companies have to continue flights into higher-risk situations and how that should be managed so that they're responding appropriately to a given level of risk.
I'm not sure if I'm making that question clear, but there is a decision made about whether a flight goes ahead. It's based on all the information they have, but obviously there's an interest there in pursuing that activity. They have a financial interest at stake.
How do you see the safer skies initiative managing that decision-making process?