Yes, ultimately, accessibility does need to be considered from the start. Unfortunately, I would say that the incident—my incident—thrust this issue into the spotlight, and if that had to happen, I'm glad it happened.
The Accessible Canada Act is forcing organizations that are regulated by the federal government to take a look at this and to actually start to put that plan in place to get accessibility to the forefront, to ensure that organizations are building it in and are understanding that 27% of the population has a disability and needs some form of accommodation and that we can't be leaving those people out anymore. This will take some time.
Infrastructure, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, is one of the things we need to be looking at going forward. In air travel, there will always be challenges. We have to be realistic about that. However, we could do better if we were planning ahead and if we were making it a priority. I have spoken with some of the folks at Boeing and other aircraft manufacturers, and I know they're working on these things. They do believe that there are ways to do it, but they have to be asked to do it by the folks who buy their planes. Ultimately, that rests with the airlines. I think it also rests with governments to signal that this is important and will be a requirement down the line, like the U.S. has done now in making it clear to the airlines that accessible washrooms will be required on single-aisle aircraft in the future.
These things take time to implement. We're talking about 10 or 15 years down the road, now that they've made that commitment, so it is something we need to be thinking about, for sure, and it will take time. Thankfully, I do believe that, with the Accessible Canada Act in place, those conversations are going to continue to be part of the urgent discussion.