Evidence of meeting #106 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was highway.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Kelly Gillis  Deputy Minister, Office of Infrastructure of Canada
Arun Thangaraj  Deputy Minister, Department of Transport
Serge Bijimine  Assistant Deputy Minister, Policy, Department of Transport
Ron Hallman  President and Chief Executive Officer, Parks Canada Agency
Andrew Campbell  Senior Vice-President, Operations, Parks Canada Agency

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

No.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Dominique Vien Conservative Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, QC

Twenty-nine out of 30 municipalities in my riding don't have access to public transit.

What is one of the main issues in our rural communities? You who come from La Tuque should be able to answer that question.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

In my opening remarks, I told you about investments that my department, through Parks Canada, has made in road infrastructure since 2015. This represents a significant increase over previous investments in road infrastructure under the Harper government. Some $1.6 billion has been invested, including in Quebec, in roads and road infrastructure.

We have committed to supporting the communities that need it by developing this network.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

You have 20 seconds left, Mrs. Vien.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Dominique Vien Conservative Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, QC

The Minister of Environment and Climate Change is clearly unaware of the reality of Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis. He expresses an utterly gratuitous judgment of the transportation needs between the two banks in the Quebec City region, and he adopts a condescending attitude toward the Quebec government when he says he has trouble following it.

If he's brave enough, he'll go and tell the businesspeople of Quebec City and Chaudière-Appalaches what he told the public transit supporters.

Go to Quebec City; go and say what you told them.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

Mr. Chair. I don't know if I've been asked a question.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

The member is unfortunately 20 seconds over time.

Ms. Koutrakis, the floor is yours.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Minister, would you like to take a few seconds to answer my colleague's question?

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

I don't think there was an actual question.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

All right.

First of all, thank you for being here with us in the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

We have heard that the government has invested $1.6 billion since 2015. Could you take a few minutes to explain to us what impact the Parks Canada investments have had on highways and roads?

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

I discussed that a bit earlier. It's quite incredible when you consider the extent of the infrastructure network that Parks Canada manages, including both road and other infrastructure. There are more than 18,000 elements in the national parks, at the historic sites and in the marine conservation areas. If we had to replace it all, it would be valued at $27 billion in 2022 dollars.

As I said earlier, our government has invested a lot more money in this infrastructure than the previous government. From 2006 to 2014, Parks Canada investments in infrastructure amounted to $1.1 billion, whereas we invested some $1.6 billion from 2015 to 2023. Our government has therefore invested $500 million more in infrastructure, particularly in transport infrastructure, through Parks Canada. We are investing nearly 50% more in that infrastructure than the previous government.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

Thank you, Minister.

Earlier you cited a few examples of capital projects in British Columbia.

Could you give us some examples of capital projects that Parks Canada has carried out in Quebec, the province I come from?

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

It's the province we both live in.

We could of course discuss the $59.5 million restoration of part of the Lachine canal infrastructure, which will be completed this year. There is the rehabilitation of the Bastion des Ursulines within the fortifications of Quebec City. An amount of $11.5 million has been allocated for that purpose. Then there are improvements to security and the visitor experience along Promenade Road in Mauricie National Park, which incidentally is near La Tuque. There's also the rehabilitation of Gauron and Lafleur bridges along the Lachine canal, in which we've invested nearly $6 million. These are investments that Parks Canada has made in Quebec in recent years.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

Thank you, Minister.

Lastly, I'd like to give you another chance to clarify the comments you made.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

Thank you very much.

As I said, I don't claim to have been misquoted. I accept full responsibility for the comments I made. I should have been clearer and said that my comment on roads specifically referred to the third link project in Quebec City.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Thank you very much, Ms. Koutrakis.

Mr. Barsalou‑Duval, the floor is now yours for two and a half minutes.

12:50 p.m.

Bloc

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

To sum up the meeting, Minister, I'd like to ask you a question. Do you realize that the remarks you made on February 12 last may have pleased a few fans but that, in the end, you set back the cause of the environment by giving a direct boost to the Conservatives?

That's ultimately why we're meeting today. This caused a widespread psychodrama because people were troubled by the dogmatic comments they heard from you.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

Are the fans you mentioned the people who were at the Trajectoire Québec conference? I'm not sure I—

12:50 p.m.

Bloc

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

I'm a Trajectoire Québec supporter.

I'm talking about the people who absolutely don't want to see a single road built.

What I'd especially like to know is whether you regret the remarks you made on February 12.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

As I said, my comments should have been clearer. I accept full responsibility for that, and I blame no one but myself.

12:50 p.m.

Bloc

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

I have no more questions, Mr. Chair.

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Thank you very much, Mr. Barsalou‑Duval.

Next we have Mr. Bachrach.

Mr. Bachrach, you have two and a half minutes, please.

12:50 p.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

There's a lot of politics surrounding your comments in this meeting, and I think everyone can acknowledge that, but at the heart of it is a very important policy conversation about the balance between investing in highways and freeways and investing in public transportation.

The concept of induced demand is well established in the urban planning field. When you make certain kinds of investments in expanding highways and freeways, you actually both undermine the climate policy goal and don't solve the problem. Often the goal is to reduce congestion and to reduce travel times. If you induce demand, you can actually undermine that goal at the same time.

I'm sure, Minister, that you're in touch with the Minister of Infrastructure and the Minister of Transport on the climate impacts of different investments. How does your department contribute to that conversation when it comes to ensuring that investing in highways and freeways doesn't undermine your government's climate goals?

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault Liberal Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC

You're right that for urban planners and the people who've studied the impact of road transportation, the concept of induced traffic is a well-known one.

I'm not a transport expert and I'm not an urban planner, although I did receive an award from the Order of Urban Planners of Quebec for my work on urban planning and transportation over the years. I guess they felt that it should be underlined.

We have, as a government, tried to increase the offer of different types of transportation modes through our investment, the largest investment in public transit in the history of the country, but we're also investing in roads. We're investing billions of dollars to help the auto sector in Canada modernize and transition to electrification, welcoming companies to Canada that have never invested here before, such as Volkswagen.

Also, we've created the first-ever public active transportation fund to fund such initiatives for municipalities, including rural municipalities. There's one in my hometown, a bike path, that's been established. We're working with municipalities all across the country to help people who want to diversify their mode of transportation to have access to those infrastructures as well.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Thank you, Minister.

Thank you, Mr. Bachrach.

Next we have Ms. Lantsman.

Ms. Lantsman, I'll give you three minutes. We'll follow that with Mr. Rogers for three minutes.

The floor is yours.