I'm talking about studies conducted by your office. If there are any, I'd like to have them.
However, I don't blame you for wanting to step away from the car-centric model. I think we can all agree on that.
I just wonder whether the purpose of your statement was to restore your image as an environmentalist and to conceal the decisions your government has made.
I'm thinking, for example, of its decision to allow the Trans Mountain purchase and even the construction of other such pipelines, as well as oil drilling permitting for places like Bay du Nord.
You've also decided to base your energy transition entirely on oil and to allow the oil companies to conduct business as usual on the assumption that isn't a serious problem because we're going to use carbon capture, an unproven experimental technology that, as far as we know, may not even work.
Ultimately, wasn't your statement solely intended to conceal your government's poor record?