I appreciate the question.
I would say two things. First, let's use Lake Erie as an example. If we were structuring these legal agreements.... As committee members, you, I think, may have opportunities to ask the proponent of the project—whether that's Fortis, if you've invited them, or NextEra, which may be taking over the project—this question. However, very clearly, our lawyers were interacting with their lawyers, and our technical advisers were interacting with theirs.
There was an earlier question about not believing the marketing materials of the proponent. I want to be very clear. The proponent also did a technical study and had its own estimate of the GHG savings. It had its own third party consultant do that. Respectfully, that's its number. We need to have our own independent view of that, which is why we hire due diligence. However, absolutely, the private sector is doing the same on its side and then some. I think that's reasonable and to be expected in these types of large commercial agreements, which are what the CIB was set up to do.