That's a great question.
We are certainly taking a very different approach, because there have been a lot of system changes that have taken place. I don't want to speak for the IESO, but even the generation resources on the system have changed since the project was essentially suspended. For example, there is much more battery storage in the province of Ontario. There are significant changes in the PJM interconnection, with a tremendous renewable queue that's waiting to be interconnected. We are certainly looking at that and engaging with all the stakeholders we have, including the first nations and the IESO, to make sure that we fully vet out what the true benefit is going to be, and that's how we're going to move it forward.
I think the approaches may be somewhat similar, but there are a lot of changes that have taken place in the last few years. I will tell you that one of the most significant changes, which I think is happening all across the North America area, is the significant load growth. Huge topics of discussion in pretty much any setting with any utilities are the data centres and the AI, artificial intelligence, load growth. All of those things are creating a massive influx of electricity load, and that is creating a need for projects like Lake Erie.
We have to engage all stakeholders, including load customers, to make sure that we understand how the system will look and where this project fits in with all the other resources the IESO has.