I really do not think that it's in the other direction. I think that what we look at with the Lake Erie project is really a project that has access to both markets. It is not what we call in the industry a generation tie line. A generation tie line is essentially generation on one end that is fully needed in order to transport down to another load. That is very different from what this project looks at. This project is not really tied to any one generation source. It is a tie between two separate markets.
The market access that IESO would have to PJM, and potentially a contract with the resources of PJM and vice versa, creates dual flow. I think that's really important, because that's the kind of tool that's needed—not just generation flowing from one area to the next, but having what's called diversification of generation resources that helps the system have the right mix in order to meet the loads that are there.