Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Farmer, at our last meeting, we were trying to understand some of the assumptions behind the modelling that helped the CIB arrive at its conclusions about greenhouse gas emissions reductions from the Lake Erie connector. I understand they relied heavily on the IESO's modelling to reach that conclusion. They have provided the committee with their consulting company's summary report based on its review of your modelling. We've shown that to various independent experts, and they have had a hard time making sense of it, because the underlying assumptions aren't included in the summary report; they're in the model.
Could the IESO provide additional information to the committee to help us analyze and better understand the assumptions that led to the conclusion that it's going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by a certain number of tonnes over a certain number of years?