Yes. Simply put, we have the Accessible Canada Act. We also have what Maayan Ziv is hitting on with the standards community designing standards that will ensure that people and organizations respect our equipment in the way our bodies are respected.
Let's be honest, because at the same time the ACA could be amended or added to. There's a whole section just on transportation, and we can add the simple fact that the accessibility equipment that individuals use on a daily and functional basis can have and should have the same human rights that I appear to. This way, it would put a little bit more into the legal framework that if something happens to my equipment, I get to put in a charter rights complaint.
Again, no, I've never heard this argument before. When I was showing up today, this is one of the ideas I wanted to present that we should look at. I believe that once organizations like Air Canada and WestJet start understanding that our equipment has the same rights we do as human beings, they will start dramatically changing the way they deal with our equipment and ensuring that when we get to point B, our equipment is there, is functional and still works.
You've heard this from several key people here today. At the end of the day, all we're asking for is for our rights to be observed and that when we buy the service to travel, we have the same consideration everybody else has. We have this one little additional thing to ask for, which is making sure that our legs, our equipment, whatever we use is there and in working order so that we're not damaged or hurt wherever we're about to go.