Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm interested in this idea of extending rights as we understand them as applying to peoples' bodies to include mobility devices. I think the testimony we've heard about how integral mobility devices are to people's lives very clearly makes the case for why that's reasonable.
From a legal perspective, I'm wondering—and perhaps this is for Mr. Brault and Mr. Reznick—whether any thought has been given to how this might be achieved. It's very difficult to crack open the charter, so outside of that, are there ways that could be reflected in law or in regulation that would have a similar effect?