We've talked a bit here about the user-pay model. Some of the panellists have gotten behind it and said that the users should pay, certainly when it comes to recreational travel. We've just done a study on HFR, high-frequency rail, where the analysis is that the government should pay for all of the infrastructure and subsidize the travel for a portion of the population that does not include any western Canadians, for instance.
Is there a logical discrepancy here? I would argue that air travel is more accessible to more Canadians than high-frequency rail will ever be. Why do you think there is such a difference in approach? The government is saying that if you're flying, you pay the full freight, but if you're taking a train, they'll subsidize you to the tune of hundreds of dollars per passenger.