You are absolutely right, sir.
This problem is primarily related to taxes. The philosophy here in Canada is to tax the user‑payer. I think that's a very bad philosophy. If we taxed airlines and passengers to try and provide adequate infrastructure, I might even say that it's for a good cause, but that's not even the case.
If I take the case of the Montréal‑Trudeau International Airport, about $140 million or $150 million, or close to 12% of its revenue, goes into the federal government's pocket in this way.
To come back to your question specifically, I can say that, when we look at competition elsewhere, in other countries, we see that it's not the traditional airlines that are creating competition. It's local players, including companies that offer low fares—very low fares—that are stepping in.
The main selling point of these companies is to offer attractive prices. When, from the outset, they have to start at $150, that means that the price they offer, by definition, will be increased by that amount, which will increase, as you mentioned.
In a way, we are cutting off these companies from the outset, and we can't give birth to medium‑term companies, as my colleague Mr. Gradek so aptly mentioned. They hold on, but at some point it doesn't work. These taxes are really a major obstacle if we are to hope that low‑cost companies will emerge in this country on a permanent basis.