Many people have pointed out that we use the user-pay model in Canada. Under that model, users pay fees based on the costs that the infrastructure generates. A somewhat different model is used elsewhere in the world, under which governments subsidize airports.
So here's a naive question: If we decided to fund the expansion of infrastructure where that investment could help create competition, would that be a good way to create that competition? We could allow the airport to expand, but by first allowing smaller businesses to have access to it.
My question is for Mr. Liebman, but I'd be glad if Mr. Rheault and Mr. Gibbons wanted to answer it as well.