You bring up the term “subsidies”, but just to be clear, some of our recommendations are not subsidies, per se, in order to rebalance the user-pay system. Our first recommendation, for instance, to reinvest the $400 million more that the federal government takes in airport rents than it reinvests in the system is not a subsidy; it's simply keeping the money in the system where it was paid. That would benefit all airports. In fact, recent studies suggest that approximately 12% of airport budgets are spent on rent to the federal government, which essentially does nothing for the system.
On the other point about subsidies, again, we're not necessarily calling for subsidies. What we are calling for is a rebalancing of the user-pay system. We don't oppose user-pay.
We look forward to more discussions on this.