Certainly it should, and that's actually part of the way that we're.... Some of this policy work remains to be finalized, but that's actually one of the reasons that we want to make this shift. That fund, again, as a newer item that we moved forward with a number of years ago—also the one that my community can rely upon without a pre-existing municipally owned public transit system—didn't necessarily see the speed of uptake that I would have hoped for or thought would happen.
By establishing more reliable criteria as part of the permanent public transit fund that smaller communities are eligible for, which we're working to develop right now, we expect that there will be a simpler, more consistent way for communities to access public transit funding. For example, communities may need a small bus to do a loop around a smaller series of communities rather than a subway system or a rapid transit bus system. You should expect to see, as the rollout of that fund comes to life, that there will be a feature designed specifically for rural communities that will be longer-term and more reliable.