Chair, just to clarify, it's not just removing a portion of Mrs. Romanado's amendment. It's removing 90%, I would argue, of Ms. Romanado's amendment. If I look at the text and the words, it's removing almost 99.9% of the amendment. I would argue that it's removing the spirit of the amendment of Mrs. Romanado.
I'm just trying to understand the advice you gave to us at first, which was that we had to vote it down, or after that, when the amendment was proposed.... Why has your ruling changed from your first ruling to your second?