I don't mean to make assumptions about our regulator, but it seems to me there's a mandate within the regulatory body to make a regulation change. The consultation process used to be this: “Let's talk to the SMEs in the industry and get their perspective.” That consultation was taken to heart and considered, and changes to the proposed regulations were made.
The regulator was also steeped in a great deal of operational experience across all regions and in Ottawa. We've seen a decrease based on some cutbacks at Transport Canada. We've seen a decrease in skilled operational personnel working at Transport Canada and an influx of a more political bent to drive regulatory change.
What we need to see, as a country, is a regulator that is driven to consult not as a box-ticking exercise but to get it right across Canada, from coast to coast to coast, including the north. It's a very stark difference. An approach ban is coming out. In some Arctic communities—because of their lack of airport infrastructure, lighting and approaches—this will decrease their service markedly, in a big way. I'm including medevac travel and food transportation in that. It's going to have a big effect. With what we saw with flight duty, and with the lack of meaningful consultation, we're all very scared, as operators. This is going to march down the same path.