No, I'll answer in a similar vein.
When I quickly look at the program that Quebec offers, I see that it seems to be getting a favourable response and that it provides low-cost travel to people in remote regions. The benefit goes directly to the traveller, which is why I suggested that government look at all subsidy programs with a view to looking at some of the best aspects that could be considered.
However, at the end of the day, often you would want to put a program in place that translates into savings to the travelling public. There are programs that we offer in northern regions that are put in place—food by mail being one of them—for which it can be argued that, despite all the subsidies, the subsidies don't translate into benefits to the end consumer. My suggestion would be that any consideration for subsidies be done in a way that the consumer or the traveller would realize the benefit.